Autor Wiadomość
ncycgdxhl
PostWysłany: Czw 14:33, 31 Mar 2011    Temat postu: Some question the value of the source Bianbai _524

Some question the value of the source Bianbai


Value of the volume can hardly be a strike 85 · ■ ■ o Second, the Is well known that the wages reflect the value of labor in the production cost of labor is non-existent before, it must rely on workers through their own mental and physical to the materialization of the production cost. The value of materialized labor is different, whether it is the object of labor or work, their value in the production process of the starting point to the existence of objective, the end of the production process they are materialized on the new products. Again, general labor only What kind of This is equal to the value of labor reproduction exhausted all new, the operators become the dispossessed. It goes without saying that this thing can only be limited to the value of the production process of the formation,tory burch reva, unfortunately, yes, this production is in reality does not exist, but is a hypothesis Bale. Finally, in terms of macroeconomic management and value creation, to focus or concentrate on the relatively high technological content of the labor sector or industry, but also beyond reproach, can be seen as facing the economic globalization and fierce international competition in a Great strategy. But we can not therefore despise or even deny the work of other sector or industry. From a management perspective, the bigger the better profits, GDP better, but can not because the pursuit of these things and ignore the basic subsistence of millions of people to solve those Six-point question: It extends to the value creation of material outside the field of production, proposed a Grasp the visible but also tangible product, or can not be called productive labor; Second, it must be to address the people food, clothing, shelter, transportation of material required for work, is to address basic human survival and development work, otherwise it can not be called productive labor. Of course, we are talking about the production of labor is of 86 * Fixed creation of use value for others, for others to solve the clothing, food, shelter, transportation of material required for the labor. Second, the productive labor and unproductive labor on the role of human survival and development are different though, but there is no distinction or distinction, is essential, are useful. As workers involved in the initial distribution of national income is reasonable and in the second distribution is also reasonable sensible, does not exist any The reason is very simple, because society is inseparable from productive labor, can not be separated, including services, including other non-productive labor. On social development, the stage of the higher level, non-production areas of labor will be more broad, more developed, even more importantly, this is the inevitable trend of social civilization. It should also be noted that party and government organs, culture, hygiene and other non-productive sectors and their labor income workers who can and has nothing to do productive work, purely national distribution system and wage policy issues. ● Notes: ① Liu Degeng: (((⑤ Marx: Technology Li Cuiling: . ⑩ Yong-Sheng Zhou, Xiang-ling: Editor: Yun Li) Bin

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group