ed with a di- vided China or wi

john9221 · Wysłany: Wto 17:37, 08 Mar 2011

talin break in the same year was also a consequence of the
hardening line bet [link widoczny dla zalogowanych][link widoczny dla zalogowanych]n the two camps. The Soviets in fact were presented
with an alternative. They could control the Eastern European satellites
while giving them a modicum of autonomyby allowing what was called at
the time “different roads to socialism.” Or they could impose absolute con-
formitybut in that case Yugoslaviathe only country that had played a role
in its own liberation from Nazi rulewould have to be excluded. The Stal-
inists chose the second solution. Given the nature of the Stalinist regime in
the postwar periodeven slightly varying interpretations of Marxist dogma
were simply unacceptable. What the Yugoslavs had in common with the
Chinese was that they had established their communist regimes without the
aid of the Red Army. It is of course not an accident that it was precisely
these countries within their own camp that challenged Soviet authority.
From the point of view of the history of world communism the victory of
the Chinese communists was incomparably more important than events in a
medium-sized Balkan country. In China before Mao’s victory the Soviet
Union exercised extreme caution. Stalin would have been satis?ed with a di-
vided China or wiyilai:
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

http://www.darknessevolution.fora.pl/guild-recruitng,17/on-the-makaloa-mat-londonjack-publishedaandlt,39593.html#47863